Legal Opinion

Roberts v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided November 21, 1990No. 185-89PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

2Per curiam

A jury convicted appellant of murder and assessed his punishment at sixty years imprisonment. The Court of Appeals affirmed this conviction. Roberts v. State, 763 S.W.2d 443 (Tex.App.—El Paso 1988). After initially refusing appellant’s petition for discretionary review, we granted the petition on appellant’s motion for rehearing to review the Court of Appeals’ finding that the parole instruction included in the charge in accord with Article 37.07, § 4(a), V.A.C.C.P., did not contribute to the punishment and was harmless under…

3Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Rose v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  2. Arnold v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
  3. Harding v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
  4. Roberts v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1988
  5. Onumonu v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by6 opinions

  1. Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995
  2. Donald Keith Dennis v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2003
  3. Donald Keith Dennis v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2003
  4. James David Rogers v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1992
  5. Reynoso v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API