Legal Opinion

Onumonu v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 3, 1989No. 11-86-212-CRPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ON REMAND

ARNOT, Justice.

This is an appeal from a conviction of theft. In an unpublished opinion, this Court affirmed the conviction, holding that the TEX. CODE CRIM.PRO.ANN. art. 37.-07, sec. 4 (Vernon Supp.1989) parole instruction in the jury charge was constitutional. The Court of Criminal Appeals vacated our judgment and remanded the case to this Court for further consideration pursuant to Rose v. State, 752 S.W.2d 529 (Tex.Cr.App.1988).

On its own motion for rehearing, the Court of Criminal Appeals held in Rose that a parole instruction given under Article 37.07, section 4 constituted…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rose v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  2. Sneed v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
  3. Cobarrubio v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
  4. Taylor v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1967

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Onumonu v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API