Legal Opinion
Holt v. State, Board of Medical Examiners
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided November 29, 1988No. C4-88-2271PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SPECIAL TERM OPINION
WOZNIAK, Chief Judge.
FACTS
Petitioner Holt is a physician. Respondent board temporarily suspended Holt’s license to practice medicine on October 11, 1988, finding that disability has rendered Holt unable to practice without serious risk of harm to the public. A contested case hearing has been scheduled to determine what, if any, disciplinary action should be taken.
Holt objected to a subpoena compelling his psychiatrist to produce medical records. Holt asserts that a right of privacy under the Minnesota Constitution precludes disclosure, and he argues that constitutional…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Jarvis v. LevineSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- State v. GraySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- Hancock-Nelson Mercantile Co. v. WeismanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1983
- In re D.M.C.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Neeland v. Clearwater Memorial HospitalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
- Clark v. MonnensCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
- Blue Cross and Blue Shield v. LarsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991