Legal Opinion

Blue Cross and Blue Shield v. Larson

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided August 6, 1991No. C3-91-1073PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPECIAL TERM OPINION

WOZNIAK, Chief Judge.

FACTS

Petitioner Larson, a psychiatrist, is the defendant in an action brought by respondent Blue Cross. Blue Cross alleges that Larson submitted false insurance claims for services he did not perform. Larson refused to disclose medical records and appointment calendars sought by Blue Cross. The trial court ordered production, with conditions restricting access and requiring the return or destruction of all such information after this suit is concluded. Larson seeks a writ of prohibition, raising claims based on statutory privilege, “constitutional…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. Louis Martin Radetsky, A/K/A L. M. RadetskyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1976
  2. In Re Subpoena Served Upon Jorge S. Zuniga, M.D. In Re Subpoena Served Upon Gary R. Pierce, M.D.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
  3. In Re Donald Pebsworth, a Witness Before the Special January 1982 Grand Jury. Appeal of Dr. Kersey AntiaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
  4. Howard v. Aid Ass'n for LutheransSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  5. Snyker v. SnykerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Humphrey v. Philip Morris Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
  2. Weisbeck v. HessSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Weisbeck v. HessSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API