Legal Opinion
State v. Gray
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided October 2, 1987No. C5-86-2047PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMDAHL, Chief Justice.
On December 2, 1986, a Hennepin County trial court dismissed a complaint charging respondent Richard G. Gray, Jr., with sodomy in violation of Minn.Stat. § 609.-293, subd. 5 (1986). The complaint was dismissed on the ground that section 609.-293, the sodomy statute, is unconstitutionally broad and infringes on its face and as applied to Gray upon the right of privacy guaranteed by the Minnesota Constitution. We accepted the state’s petition for accelerated review of the trial court’s order; we reverse and remand to the trial court for trial or other disposition.
In July…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- New York v. FerberSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- State v. HarrisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- Kahn v. GriffinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
- State v. SorensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- Skeen v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
- Jarvis v. LevineSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.