In re D.M.C.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
TODD, Justice.
Petitioners are each parents of an adult child they have sought to have involuntarily committed. The trial court appointed an examining psychiatrist. The petitioners requested that the examining doctor be permitted to examine the prior medical records of their respective children. The trial court denied this request on the grounds of medical privilege and limited the review of medical records to those obtained subsequent to the filing of the commitment petition. The petitioners seek a writ of prohibition in this court directing that the examining doctor be permitted to examine…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Northwest Publications, Inc. v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- State v. EnebakSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
3Cited by17 opinions
- In Re McCaskillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- State v. CostelloSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- Matter of BuckhaltonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
- Muller v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
- Matter of MortonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.