Legal Opinion

Hancock-Nelson Mercantile Co. v. Weisman

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided December 7, 1983No. CX-83-1767PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

POPOVICH, Chief Judge.

Application for a writ of prohibition pursuant to Civil Appellate Procedure Rule 120 to restrain the entry of the order of Judge Crane Winton of the Hennepin County District Court dated November 9, 1983 and stayed to November 11, 1983 to permit this application. At oral argument the parties agreed to a stay until this Court acted. Judge Winton’s order found probable cause to believe the petitioners were in criminal contempt by violating Minn.Stat. Chapter 588 and had violated the court’s order appointing a receiver to operate a corporation in which the parties…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. In Re TylerSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Wiswall v. SampsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1853
  3. Ginsberg v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
  4. Nemo v. Local Joint Executive Board & Hotel & Restaurant Employees' Local No. 556Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
  5. Bellows v. EricsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Hawaii Ventures, LLC v. Otaka, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Equity Trust Co. Custodian FBO Heather Eisenmenger Ira v. ColeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
  3. Bartholomew v. Avalon Capital Group, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2009
  4. Minneapolis Star and Tribune Co. v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  5. State v. HagenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API