Legal Opinion
Clark v. Monnens
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided March 21, 1989No. C9-89-252PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SPECIAL TERM OPINION
WOZNIAK, Chief Judge.
FACTS
Petitioners brought a personal injury action arising from a car accident. Respondent sought an order for an independent psychological (or “mental”) examination pursuant to Minn.R.Civ.P. 35.01. The trial court found the mental condition of petitioner Gail Clark had been placed in controversy and the scope of the requested examination was appropriately limited. Petitioners seek discretionary review of the order granting the independent examination.
DECISION
This court may, in the interest of justice, allow an appeal from an order which is not…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Anderson v. FlorenceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
- Price v. AmdalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Thermorama, Inc. v. ShillerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
- Mampel v. Eastern Heights State Bank of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Holt v. State, Board of Medical ExaminersCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
3Cited by4 opinions
- McKenzie v. Northern States Power Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
- Kalia v. St. Cloud State UniversityCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
- Kalia v. St. Cloud State UniversityCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
- Progressive Insurance Co. (Pago Pago) Ltd. v. Southern Star International, Inc.High Court of American Samoa · 2001