Legal Opinion

Neeland v. Clearwater Memorial Hospital

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 12, 1977No. 46933PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROGOSHESKE, Justice.

On this review by writ of certiorari, Clearwater Memorial Hospital, a political subdivision employer, seeks to challenge the constitutionality of provisions in the Minnesota Employment Services Law, Minn.St. c. 268, which require a political subdivision to reimburse the unemployment compensation fund for all benefits paid to an employee, even when such employee discontinues working voluntarily and without good cause attributable to the employer. For reasons which follow, we hold that the hospital does not have standing to challenge the constitutionality of this statutory…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Loew v. Hagerle BrothersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
  2. State Ex Rel. Clinton Falls Nursery Co. v. County of SteeleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  3. Metropolitan Utilities District v. Merritt Beach Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Minn. State Bd. of Health v. City of BrainerdSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  5. PORT AUTHORITY OF CITY OF ST. PAUL v. FisherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Easy Street West v. Commissioner of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  2. Padilla v. Minnesota State Board of Medical ExaminersCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  3. Fantasysrus 2, L.L.C. v. City of East Grand ForksDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2012
  4. In Re the License Application of Rochester Ambulance ServiceCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
  5. Wilhite v. Scott County Housing & Redevelopment AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API