Legal Opinion
ABF Capital Corp. v. Berglass
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 28, 2005No. B171700PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SPENCER, P. J.
INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff ABF Capital Corp. appeals from a judgment entered after the trial court sustained without leave to amend the demurrer of defendant Robert Berglass. Defendant appeals from an order denying his motion for an award of reasonable attorney’s fees.
Plaintiff contends the trial court abused its discretion in denying its motion for a new trial and in sustaining without leave to amend defendant’s demurrer. Defendant contends the trial court erred in applying New York law to his motion for an award of reasonable attorney’s fees. We reject plaintiff’s…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
- Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Mastrobuono v. Shearson Lehman Hutton, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Nedlloyd Lines B v. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Oscar Gruss & Son, Inc., Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Yossie Hollander, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Gottlieb v. KestCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Professional Collection Consultants v. LauronCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
- First Intercontinental Bank v. Christina AhnCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- In re Grand Theft Auto Video Game Consumer LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- Fuller v. First Franklin Financial Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2013
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.