Legal Opinion

First Intercontinental Bank v. Christina Ahn

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 18, 2015No. 13-56097PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

M. SMITH, Circuit Judge:

In this appeal, we apply California choice-of-law rules to determine whether California law or Georgia law governs an attorney’s fees dispute between Plaintiff-Appellant First Intercontinental Bank (Bank) and Defendant-Appellee Christina Ahn (Christina). We conclude that California law, specifically California Civil Code § 1717(a), governs the attorney’s fees dispute, and we affirm the district court’s decision awarding attorney’s fees to Christina.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

I. Factual Background

In March of 2009, First Intercontinental Bank, a bank…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  2. Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. Pegram v. HerdrichSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Wash. Mut. Bank v. Superior Court of Orange Cty.California Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Nedlloyd Lines B v. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Mary Murray v. Bej Minerals, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  2. North River Insurance Company v. James River Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
  3. Affordable Builders of America, Inc. v. ThomasDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
  4. Aman Truck Lines, LLC v. MST Insurance Services, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2026
  5. Bennett v. T-Mobile USA IncDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2024

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API