Legal Opinion

Nedlloyd Lines B v. v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided August 31, 1992No. Docket Nos. S015917, S019540PublishedCited by 327 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BAXTER, J.

We granted review to consider the effect of a choice-of-law clause in a contract between commercial entities to finance and operate an international shipping business. In our order granting review, we limited our consideration to the question whether and to what extent the law of Hong Kong, chosen in the parties’ agreement, should be applied in ruling on defendant’s demurrer to plaintiff’s complaint.

We conclude the choice-of-law clause, which requires that the contract be “governed by” the law of Hong Kong, a jurisdiction having a substantial connection with the parties, is…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Foley v. Interactive Data Corp.California Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Smith, Valentino & Smith, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Trident Center v. Connecticut General Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  4. McDermott Inc. v. LewisSupreme Court of Delaware · 1987
  5. Carlock v. Pillsbury Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1989

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by327 opinions

  1. Wash. Mut. Bank v. Superior Court of Orange Cty.California Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Discover Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Abry Partners V, L.P. v. F & W Acquisition LLCCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2006
  4. In Re Howmedica Osteonics Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
  5. Caitlin Ahearn v. Hyundai Motor AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019

322 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API