Legal Opinion
Professional Collection Consultants v. Lauron
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 16, 2017No. H042686PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ELIA, J.
—This appeal arises out of a credit card debt collection action involving two credit cards. Appellant Professional Collection Consultants (PCC), as an assignee of the original creditor, filed a complaint against respondent Krystal G. Lauron alleging common counts of account stated and open book account. Lauron filed a cross-complaint alleging PCC was attempting to collect on a time-barred debt in violation of the federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) (15 U.S.C. § 1692 et seq.) and California’s Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (Rosenthal Act) (Civ. Code,…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
- Jones v. R. R. Donnelley & Sons Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Careau & Co. v. Security Pacific Business Credit, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1990
- Nedlloyd Lines B v. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Times Mirror Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Tom Brakke and Rhonda Brakke D/B/A/ Pine Ridge Hunting Lodge, and McBra, Inc. v. Iowa Department of Natural Resources and Iowa Natural Resource CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 2017
- Monster, LLC v. Superior Court of L. A. Cnty., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- San Diego Unified Sch. Dist. v. Yee, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Prof'l Collection Consultants v. Lujan, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Etchegaray Farms, LLC v. Lehr Bros., Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2018
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.