Legal Opinion
Stanley v. Parsons
Washington Supreme Court
Decided April 3, 1930No. 22179. Department OnePublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTolman, J.
Appellants, as plaintiffs, sued for damages alleged to have been sustained through an exchange of real estate, averring in their complaint that they were to 'receive certain farm lands in Okanogan county, Washington, which, according to the written exchange contract, wore to be conveyed to them by “good and marketable title.” It is further alleged:
“That thereafter and in partial compliance with their said contract, schedule ‘A’ hereto, and on or about the 15th day of April, 1926, at Seattle, Washington, the said defendants made, executed and delivered to the plaintiff, F. M. Stanley, acting…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bradford v. AdamsWashington Supreme Court · 1913
- Pratt v. ThompsonWashington Supreme Court · 1925
- Williams v. HewittWashington Supreme Court · 1910
- Scott v. StanleyWashington Supreme Court · 1928
3Cited by12 opinions
- McInnis & Co. v. Western Tractor & Equipment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1964
- Liner v. Armstrong Homes of Bremerton, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1978
- Thompson v. HustonWashington Supreme Court · 1943
- Gronlund v. AnderssonWashington Supreme Court · 1951
- Algee v. Hillman Investment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1942
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.