Legal Opinion
Scott v. Stanley
Washington Supreme Court
Decided September 4, 1928No. 21175. Department OnePublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.
Prank M. Stanley and his wife claimed to own sixteen . hundred acres ofland in Okanogan county, and William Steward owned the Chalmers Apartments in Seattle. Through the efforts of their respective real estate brokers, a written non-tract was entered into for an exchange of the proper ties by the owners. Scott & Conway were brokers; for Stanley and wife, and L. C. Allison & Company were brokers for Steward. The contract' was signed by the owners of the properties and by both firms of brokers. It specified the amount each firm of brokers should receive for its services. Conveyances of the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Palmquist v. SagstadWashington Supreme Court · 1910
- Krohn v. HirschWashington Supreme Court · 1914
- Coleman v. CrawfordWashington Supreme Court · 1926
- Summy v. RamseyWashington Supreme Court · 1909
- Magee v. Big Bend Land Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1909
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Tucker v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1944
- Barber v. PeringerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1994
- Stanley v. ParsonsWashington Supreme Court · 1930
- France v. FreezeWashington Supreme Court · 1940
- Davies v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1939