Legal Opinion

Gronlund v. Andersson

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1951No. 31568PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.

— This is an action for rescission of a contract for the purchase of certain real property, consisting of a residence and residential facilities, located on Bainbridge island, Kitsap county, Washington. The complaint alleged that the defendants, Doctor and Mrs. Andersson, had been the owners of the property in question; that they employed a realtor, one Russell Munro, as their agent, to sell it; that the realtor took the plaintiffs, Mr. and Mrs. Gronlund, to the property for the purpose of showing it to them in anticipation of their purchase of it; and that he and his agents

“ . . . showed the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Smith v. FletcherWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Dieterich v. RiceWashington Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Thompson v. HustonWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Lou v. Bethany Lutheran Church of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Mather v. BarnesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Pennsylvania · 1906

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Black v. Evergreen Land Developers, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Becker v. Lagerquist Bros., Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Lyall v. DeYoungCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1985
  4. Miller v. BoegerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
  5. Holland Furnace Co. v. KorthWashington Supreme Court · 1953

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API