Legal Opinion

McInnis & Co. v. Western Tractor & Equipment Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 23, 1964No. 36468PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDonworth, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment by which respondent was awarded damages based on a finding that respondent did not receive the grading equipment that it ordered and for which it had paid appellant. The complaint alleged certain specific misrepresentations on the part of appellant which induced the sale of the equipment, and prayed for damages. No rescission was sought.

Respondent, Mclnnis and Company, Inc., is a large exporting firm, with its headquarters in Seattle. January 13, 1958, respondent was informed by its agent in Okinawa that the Okinawa Trading Company was in the market for a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Webster v. L. Romano Engineering Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Salter v. HeiserWashington Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Gnash v. SaariWashington Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Holland Furnace Co. v. KorthWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Nyquist v. FosterWashington Supreme Court · 1954

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Berg v. StrommeWashington Supreme Court · 1971
  2. McRae v. BolstadCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1982
  3. Nakanishi v. FosterWashington Supreme Court · 1964
  4. In re Gen. Motors LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
  5. Simpson v. Western National Bank of CasperWyoming Supreme Court · 1972

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API