Legal Opinion

Algee v. Hillman Investment Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 14, 1942No. 28559PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSimpson, J.

Plaintiffs instituted this action to rescind, or in the alternative to reform, a real estate contract entered into between themselves and defendant. A trial to the court resulted in a judgment rescinding the contract and awarding plaintiff recovery in the sum of $555.66, less $250 for the use of the premises and depreciation. Defendant appealed.

The assigned errors which we deem it necessary to consider are in entering judgment in favor of respondents, in concluding that there was a mistake or constructive fraud chargeable to appellant, and in determining that a rescission was available to…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Thomas v. McCueWashington Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Freeman v. GloydWashington Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Bradford v. AdamsWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Angel v. Columbia Canal Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Lou v. Bethany Lutheran Church of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1932

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Skagit State Bank v. RasmussenWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Dixon v. MacGillivrayWashington Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Darnell v. NoelWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Thompson v. HustonWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Cunningham v. Studio Theatre, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1951

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API