Legal Opinion
Harada v. Fitzpatrick
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 21, 1939No. Civ. 2335PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.
This is an appeal by John A. and James F. Fitzpatrick from a judgment vacating an order which modified an interlocutory decree of divorce on the ground that the order was obtained by extrinsic fraud. (Sometimes in the record James F. is called James V. Fitzpatrick.) Defendant Verna N. Fitzpatrick, who was the defendant in the divorce action has not appealed.
John A. Fitzpatrick and Verna N. Fitzpatrick were husband and wife. James F. Fitzpatrick is their son. They had another son and two daughters.
Mr. and Mrs. Fitzpatrick owned thirty-five acres of farming land near Oceanside, in San Diego…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- McGuinness v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Campbell-Kawannanakoa v. CampbellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Herd v. TuohyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Follette v. Pacific Light & Power Corp.California Supreme Court · 1922
- Rehfuss v. RehfussCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Public Utilities Commission v. RyersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Mary R. v. B. & R. CORP.California Court of Appeal · 1983
- Wyoming Pacific Oil Co. v. PrestonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Babbitt v. BabbittCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Hickey v. RobyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.