Legal Opinion
Hickey v. Roby
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 9, 1969No. Civ. 25534PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtElkington, J.
—William J. Hickey, plaintiff below, appeals from an order of the superior court setting aside a permanent injunction which purported to enjoin defendant Vallecito Water Company (Vallecito), defendant Camille Garnier, Vallecito’s president, and defendant W. H. Roby, Vallecito’s secretary, from “transferring, cancelling or reversing” on Vallecito’s books without Hickey’s consent, 18,003 shares of Vallecito stock registered to Hickey. Defendants Vallecito, Garnier and Roby have made no appearance on this appeal. The only respondent is the California Public Utilities Commission appearing, as…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
- People v. Western Air Lines, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1954
- Olivera v. GraceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Pacific Telephone Etc. Co. v. EshlemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Loustalot v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Greener v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- American Drug Stores, Inc. v. StrohCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Barnett v. Delta Lines, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1982
- Southern Pacific Transportation Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Product Research Associates v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co.California Court of Appeal · 1971
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.