Legal Opinion

Rehfuss v. Rehfuss

California Supreme Court

Decided January 2, 1915No. S.F. No. 6171PublishedCited by 49 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, C. J.

Appeal from order setting aside an interlocutory judgment of divorce.

Plaintiff brought an action against defendant for divorce, on the ground of extreme cruelty. Defendant answered, denying specifically the acts of cruelty alleged against her. With her answer she filed a cross-complaint, charging plaintiff with extreme cruelty and praying for a divorce from him. No answer to the cross-complaint was ever filed. After filing her original answer and cross-complaint, the defendant filed an amended answer in which she admitted all of the averments of the plaintiff’s complaint. Thereafter the ease…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Earle v. EarleIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Foley v. FoleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Johnson v. ColemanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1868
  4. Allen v. Allen, Barber v. BarberSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1900
  5. Graham v. GrahamWashington Supreme Court · 1909

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. McGuinness v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Carney v. SimmondsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Van DeRyt v. Van DeRytOhio Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Ryder v. RyderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  5. Crouch v. CrouchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API