Legal Opinion

People Ex Rel. Public Utilities Commission v. Ryerson

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 24, 1966No. Civ. 7735PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTamura, J.

Pursuant to an investigation, decision and order of the Public Utilities Commission a carrier brought an action against a shipper to recover undercharges. Based upon a stipulation of facts entered into by the parties, judgment was entered for the shipper. The question presented on this appeal is whether the Public Utilities Commission in the name of the People may maintain an independent equitable action to vacate the judgment on grounds of extrinsic fraud or mistake and lack of jurisdiction in the court to render the judgment.

The carrier, respondents Ryerson and Phillips, doing business as…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Olivera v. GraceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Bennett v. Hibernia BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  3. City & County of San Francisco v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Campbell-Kawannanakoa v. CampbellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Gardner v. Rich Manufacturing Co., Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1945

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Waters v. Pacific Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Empire West v. Southern California Gas Co.California Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Timberidge Enterprises, Inc. v. City of Santa RosaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  4. Mary R. v. B. & R. CORP.California Court of Appeal · 1983
  5. South Tahoe Gas Co. v. Hofmann Land Improvement Co.California Court of Appeal · 1972

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API