Legal Opinion

Garden Water Corp. v. Fambrough

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 29, 1966No. Civ. 649PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment for the value .of a water system taken by inverse condemnation. Respondent and his associates developed and subdivided a tract of land in Kern County, including construction of a domestic water system to serve approximately 96 homes in tracts 2394 and 2427. Prior to the commencement of this action, respondent acquired the interests of his associates.

On November 1,1961, while appellant, Garden Water Corporation, was negotiating to purchase the system it took possession of the property. Although no agreement had been reached, appellant obtained a certificate of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Tulare Irrigation District v. Lindsay-Strathmore Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Frustuck v. City of FairfaxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  3. Beals v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Southern Pacific Co. v. Spring Valley Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Trask v. MooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Leaf v. City of San MateoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  2. Travis v. County of Santa CruzCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Bookout v. State of California Ex Rel. Department of TransportationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  4. Otay Water District v. BeckwithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  5. Sandpiper Mobile Village v. City of CarpinteriaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API