Beals v. City of Los Angeles
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGibson, C. J.
In this action plaintiff seeks to restrain defendants from closing a public alley pursuant to ordinances enacted by the City of Los Angeles and to have such ordinances declared void. The trial court sustained a general demurrer without leave to amend.
The ordinances were adopted under the Street Opening Act of 1889 (Stats. 1889, p. 70; Deering’s Gen. Laws, 1937, Act 8195) and provide for the partial vacation of an alley running in an easterly and westerly direction between Boylston and Corto Streets, which run north and south. Plaintiff’s property is located on the corner of First and Corto…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Bacich v. Board of ControlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Peabody v. City of VallejoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Duncan v. RamishCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Collier v. Merced Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Brown v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- People v. Ocean Shore Railroad, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1948
- Harman v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Frustuck v. City of FairfaxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Housing Authority v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Rank v. (Krug) United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1956
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.