Bookout v. State of California Ex Rel. Department of Transportation
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GILBERT, P. J.
Plaintiff alleges damages because several defendants caused flooding on his property when it rained. We conclude, among other things, that the flooding allegedly caused by the public entities here does not constitute control or posession of the plaintiff’s property. Therefore the three-year statute of limitations applies.
We also conclude that the rules of causation are the same whether applied in inverse condemnation or tort.
Plaintiff brought this action against a number of public entities and a railroad claiming defendants caused his property to flood when it rained. The…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Mangini v. Aerojet-General Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1991
- Baker v. Burbank-Glendale-Pasadena Airport AuthorityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Frustuck v. City of FairfaxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Pierpont Inn, Inc. v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Sprague v. Equifax, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1985
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Atkins v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
- Almanor Lakeside Villas Owners Ass'n. v. CarsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- P. v. Petronella CA4/3California Court of Appeal · 2013
- Patricia A. Murray Dental Corp. v. Dentsply Int'l, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Fuller v. Dep't of Transp., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.