Legal Opinion
Otay Water District v. Beckwith
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 16, 1991No. D012803PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WIENER, Acting P. J.
Plaintiff Otay Water District (Otay) sued adjacent property owners defendants Warren W. Beckwith, Donald F. Wall and others, seeking to quiet title to a prescriptive easement. Defendants cross-claimed for inverse condemnation, ejectment, and fraud. After Otay successfully moved for summary judgment, the court entered judgment against defendants on the complaint and cross-complaint. Only Beckwith appeals contending the court erred in granting Otay a prescriptive easement and in dismissing with prejudice his suit for inverse condemnation. We affirm the judgment.
Factual…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- City of Pasadena v. California-Michigan Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1941
- Frustuck v. City of FairfaxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Hannah v. PogueCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Warsaw v. Chicago Metallic Ceilings, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1984
- Williams v. Southern Pacific R.R. Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Golden West Baseball Co. v. City of AnaheimCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Kong v. CITY OF HAWAIIAN GARDENS REDEVELOPMENT AGENCYCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Mehdizadeh v. MincerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- ge Condominium Association, Inc. v. Lo Viento Blanco, LLCColorado Court of Appeals · 2020
- Blackmore v. PowellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.