Grundel v. Union Iron Works
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.;
1Opinion of the CourtVan Dyke, J.
The plaintiff brings this action under section 377 of the Code of Civil Procedure of this state, as administrator of the estate of Frank Grundel, deceased, to recover damages on account of the death of the latter, occasioned by the wrongful acts of the defendants. Eighteen defendants were named in the complaint, five of whom are fictitious, and no person appeared or answered in their name. The corporation defendant answered separately, and the twelve other defendants, represented by other attorneys, also appeared and answered. Kine of these twelve subsequently filed a supplemental answer…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Livingston v. BishopNew York Supreme Court · 1806
- Dawson v. SchlossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Butler v. AshworthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Nichols v. DunphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
3Cited by15 opinions
- DKN Holdings LLC v. FaerberCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
- Fowden v. Pacific Coast Steamship Co.California Supreme Court · 1906
- Cole v. Roebling Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1909
- Orange County Water District v. City of RiversideCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Milicevich v. Sacramento Medical CenterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.