Legal Opinion

Fowden v. Pacific Coast Steamship Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided April 10, 1906No. S.F. No. 3507PublishedCited by 59 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, J.

On May 15, 1898, Mark Fowden, while a passenger on defendant corporation’s steamer, Santa Rosa, bound from Port Angeles, Los Angeles County, to the city and county of San Francisco, and while such steamer was docking at Santa Barbara, was severely injured by reason of the parting of a thirteen-inch hawser used in said docking, which had been attached to a pile on the wharf, and which parted under the strain to which it was subjected, one end thereof recoiling and striking Fowden upon his face and head. Fowden instituted this action for damages resulting from the injuries thus received,…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Martin's Administrator v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Green v. SouleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Lewis v. St. Louis & Iron Mountain RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1875
  4. Hubbell v. . MeigsNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  5. Chetwood v. California National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. Zibbell v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Sullivan v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Estate of BairdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Peters v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Gird v. BennettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API