Legal Opinion

DKN Holdings LLC v. Faerber

California Supreme Court

Decided July 13, 2015No. S218597PublishedCited by 263 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CORRIGAN, J.

We granted review to clarify a bedrock principle of contract law: Parties who are jointly and severally liable on an obligation may be sued in separate actions. Although long-standing case law has found separate actions permissible, the Court of Appeal here held that a second suit is barred after entry of judgment against one of the contracting parties. The court reasoned that a breach of contract invades a single primary right, and plaintiff could not split its breach of contract cause of action into multiple claims. This reasoning was erroneous because joint and several…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Migra v. Warren City School District Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Hansberry v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  5. Bernhard v. Bank of America National Trust & Saving AssociationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by263 opinions

  1. People v. StrongCalifornia Supreme Court · 2022
  2. Samara v. MatarCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Daniels v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2016
  4. Edward Furnace v. G. GiurbinoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  5. Association of Irritated Residents v. Department of ConservationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017

258 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API