DKN Holdings LLC v. Faerber
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CORRIGAN, J.
We granted review to clarify a bedrock principle of contract law: Parties who are jointly and severally liable on an obligation may be sued in separate actions. Although long-standing case law has found separate actions permissible, the Court of Appeal here held that a second suit is barred after entry of judgment against one of the contracting parties. The court reasoned that a breach of contract invades a single primary right, and plaintiff could not split its breach of contract cause of action into multiple claims. This reasoning was erroneous because joint and several…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Migra v. Warren City School District Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Hansberry v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Bernhard v. Bank of America National Trust & Saving AssociationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by263 opinions
- People v. StrongCalifornia Supreme Court · 2022
- Samara v. MatarCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
- Daniels v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2016
- Edward Furnace v. G. GiurbinoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Association of Irritated Residents v. Department of ConservationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
258 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.