Legal Opinion

Milicevich v. Sacramento Medical Center

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 16, 1984No. Civ. 22310PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BLEASE, J.

Plaintiffs Mirko and DeVonna Milicevich, husband and wife, appeal from a summary judgment in favor of defendant Sacramento Medical Center. (See Code Civ. Proc., § 437c.) Plaintiffs’ tort action seeks damages for injuries arising out of a suicide attempt by Mirko. The motion for summary judgment was premised on the theory that satisfaction of a statutory consent judgment (Code Civ. Proc., § 998) by other defendants discharged the liability of the medical center by operation of law.

We hold that satisfaction of a judgment, entered pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 998,…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. American Motorcycle Assn. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  2. United States v. International Building Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
  3. People v. GilbertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Folsom v. Butte County Assn. of GovernmentsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Tompkins v. Clay St. R.R.California Supreme Court · 1884

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Adrian C. Eichman v. Fotomat Corporation, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  2. California State Automobile Ass'n. Inter-Insurance Bureau v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Clark v. Yosemite Community College DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  4. Welsh v. Gerber Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
  5. Kirkpatrick v. Chrysler Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API