Newport Mining Co. v. Bead Lake Gold-Copper Mining Co.
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of tbe superior court for Pend Oreille county, Sessions, J., entered December 7, 1918, upon findings in favor of tbe plaintiff, in an action to try title to overlapping mining claims, tried to the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.
Parties to this action are rival claimants to a certain tract of mining ground located in the Newport mining district, in Pend Oreille county. The cause was tried to the court without a jury, and resulted in findings of fact, conclusions of law, and a judgment sustaining the plaintiff’s right to the disputed territory. From this judgment, the defendant appeals.
The assignments of error practically all relate to the findings of fact and conclusions of law entered by the trial court, and its refusal to make the findings of fact and conclusions of law presented by the appellant. The respondent is…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Altoona Quicksilver Mining Co. v. Integral Quicksilver Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1896
- Lavagnino v. UhligUtah Supreme Court · 1903
- National Milling & Mining Co. v. PiccoloWashington Supreme Court · 1909
- Florence-Rae Copper Co. v. KimbelWashington Supreme Court · 1915
- Gold Creek Antimony Mines & Smelter Co. v. PerryWashington Supreme Court · 1917
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. Consolidated Mines & Smelting Co., Ltd., & Hugh Brown, United States of America v. Consolidated Mines & Smelting Co., Ltd., and Hugh BrownCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
- United States v. Consolidated Mines & Smelting Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
- Lind v. BakerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Fisher v. JacksonWashington Supreme Court · 1922
- Springer v. Southern Pac. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1926
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.