Legal Opinion

Springer v. Southern Pac. Co.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 1926No. 4388PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFrick, J.

The plaintiffs, hereinafter called appellants, commenced this action in the district court of Boxelder county, Utah, to enjoin the defendant, hereinafter designated respondent, from trespassing upon certain mining claims to which appellants claim the right of possession, and for an accounting. The question respecting the accounting or damages was by agreement of the parties not considered by the court, and no further notice will be taken of that feature of the case. The controversy arises respecting the right of possession and use of certain mineral lands the legal title to which is, and is…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Belk v. MeagherSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. Cole v. RalphSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  3. SPARKS & Another v. PIERCE & OthersSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  4. Altoona Quicksilver Mining Co. v. Integral Quicksilver Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Humphreys v. Idaho Gold Mines Development Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1912

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. McLean v. LadewigCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  2. Independence Placer Mining Co. v. HellmanIdaho Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Lind v. BakerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  4. Fuller Ex Rel. Fuller v. Mountain SculptureUtah Supreme Court · 1957
  5. United States v. Richard P. HaskinsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API