Lavagnino v. Uhlig
Utah Supreme Court
Appeal from tlie Third District Court, Salt Lake County. — Hon. W. C. Hall, Judge. Action by the plaintiff as the owner of the “Yes You Do” mining claim, in support of an adverse claim •duly filed by the plaintiff, against the application of the defendants for a patent to the Uhlig No. 1 and the Uhlig No. 2 lode mining claims. Prom a decree in favor •of the defendants, the plaintiff appealed.
Read the full summary
Appeal from tlie Third District Court, Salt Lake County. — Hon. W. C. Hall, Judge. Action by the plaintiff as the owner of the “Yes You Do” mining claim, in support of an adverse claim •duly filed by the plaintiff, against the application of the defendants for a patent to the Uhlig No. 1 and the Uhlig No. 2 lode mining claims. Prom a decree in favor •of the defendants, the plaintiff appealed. The questions involved are: 1. Is the location of the “Yes You Do” void because made by a deputy United States mineral surveyor, who continued, to retain a contingent interest in the claim, but who…
1Opinion of the CourtBaskin, C. J.
The refusal to permit the certified copy of the location notice of the Yes You Do, and the deed offered in connection therewith, to be introduced in evidence, and the rejection of the evidence relating to the Levi P. and Yeta mining claims, is assigned as error.
Section 452, Rev. St. U. S. (U. S. Comp. St. 1901, 1 p. 257), provides: “The officers, clerks, and employees in the General Land Office are prohibited from directly or indirectly purchasing or becoming interested in the purchase of any of the public land; and any person who violates this section shall forthwith be removed from his…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Belk v. MeagherSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Hastings & Dakota Railroad v. WhitneySupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Eureka Consol. Min. Co. v. Richmond Min. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nevada · 1877
- Altoona Quicksilver Mining Co. v. Integral Quicksilver Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1896
- Doe v. Waterloo Min. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1895
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- J. Bryant Kasey and Maryann Kasey v. Molybdenum Corporation of America, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- Sil-Flo Corporation v. BowenArizona Supreme Court · 1965
- Mares v. DillonMontana Supreme Court · 1904
- Hand v. CookNevada Supreme Court · 1907
- Nevada Exploration & Mining Co. v. SpriggsUtah Supreme Court · 1912
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.