United States v. Consolidated Mines & Smelting Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
JAMES M. CARTER, Circuit Judge:
This case concerns mining claims on an Indian reservation. Our decision breaks new ground in holding that the doctrine of exhaustion of administrative remedies does not require completion of appellate or review proceedings within the agency. The decision also considers the effect of a withdrawal of Indian lands from entry and disposal under the Land and Mining laws of the United States, and holds that revocation of withdrawals may not be accomplished by circumstances or procedures less formal than those attending the withdrawal. The decision also considers…
2Cases cited58 opinions
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- McKart v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Bowles v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- United States v. L. A. Tucker Truck Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Darby v. CisnerosSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Montgomery v. RumsfeldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- Biotics Research Corporation v. Margaret Heckler, Sec'y Etc., Seroyal Brands, Inc. v. Margaret Heckler, Sec'y Etc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- National Forest Preservation Group v. ButzCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
- Jennings Water, Inc. v. City of North Vernon, Indiana, and Csl Utilities, Inc., and Csl Community Association, Inc., InterveningCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.