Legal Opinion

Fisher v. Jackson

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 11, 1922No. 16875PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

— From a final decree adjudging respondent to he entitled to the exclusive possession of the east half of the west half, and the west half of the east half, of lot 3, section 6, township 34 north, range 25 E. W. M., in Okanogan county, Washington, this appeal is taken.

*108The court first entered a decree on August 6, 1918, adjudging the respondent to be the owner of the land involved and entitled to the possession thereof, quieting title in him, and enjoining the appellant from claiming any title in and to the land, and from entering or in any manner trespassing thereupon.

A motion for a new trial…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Stofferan v. Okanogan CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  2. National Milling & Mining Co. v. PiccoloWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Florence-Rae Copper Co. v. KimbelWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Newport Mining Co. v. Bead Lake Gold-Copper Mining Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Gold Creek Antimony Mines & Smelter Co. v. PerryWashington Supreme Court · 1917

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. MurleyWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  2. State v. CanadayWashington Supreme Court · 1971
  3. State v. Dakota County, NebraskaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1958
  4. Landis v. Sea Isle CityNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1941
  5. Marinovich v. LindhWashington Supreme Court · 1923

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API