Lind v. Baker
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment denying plaintiff title to six unpatented mining claims in the Vanderbilt mining district in San Bernardino County, and awarding to defendant C. C. Darling, subject to the paramount title of the United States, four unpatented mining claims in that district; to Annie M.- Baker, Bayard T. Baker, Verne A. Baker and Elizabeth Henderson Baker (hereinafter referred to as the Baker Group), subject to the paramount title of the United States, four unpatented mining claims in that district. The Baker Group claims were made subject to the contractual rights of Fred…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Belk v. MeagherSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- See v. North American Accident InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Forbes v. GraceySupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Cole v. RalphSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Altoona Quicksilver Mining Co. v. Integral Quicksilver Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1896
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Newman v. CorneliusCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Lind v. BakerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- United States v. 9,947.71 Acres of Land, More or Less, in County of Clark, State of NevadaDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1963
- Denman v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Brown v. MurphyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.