Legal Opinion

Florence-Rae Copper Co. v. Kimbel

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 17, 1915No. 12473PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Snohomish county, Bell, J., entered April 27, 1914, upon findings in favor of the defendant, dismissing an action for an injunction, tried to the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

Appellant is a mining corporation claiming the right to possession of eighteen located mining claims in the Sultan Mining District, in Snohomish county, Washington, having acquired same by location and by purchase from other locators during the years 1910 and 1911. The claims have never gone to patent, but are held and operated under the general mining laws of the United States and of this state, requiring annual assessment work to be done on each claim or upon one claim for the entire group. The claims in issue were held and operated as a group. The president and most active stockholder of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Belk v. MeagherSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. Emerson v. McWhirterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  3. McCulloch v. MurphyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nevada · 1903
  4. Clason v. MatkoSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  5. National Milling & Mining Co. v. PiccoloWashington Supreme Court · 1909

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Public Service Co. of Oklahoma v. BleakArizona Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Karnes v. FlintWashington Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Fisher v. JacksonWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Newport Mining Co. v. Bead Lake Gold-Copper Mining Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Gold Creek Antimony Mines & Smelter Co. v. PerryWashington Supreme Court · 1917

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API