Legal Opinion

Victor Bono v. Michael Benov, Warden, United States Parole Commission

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 22, 1999No. 98-55895PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WARDLAW, Circuit Judge:

The government appeals the district court’s order granting Victor Bono (“Bono”) a writ of habeas corpus and ordering Bono’s forthwith release from custody. The district court ruled that the United States Parole Commission acted with presumed vindictiveness when it changed Bono’s presumptive parole date from July 17, 1997 to July 17, 2009. The government asserts that the presumption of vindictiveness should not apply and even if it does, that it has been rebutted by the existence of objective facts supporting the Commission’s decision to extend Bono’s release date. We…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. United States v. GoodwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Alabama v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Chaffin v. StynchcombeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Wasman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. United States v. Conrado Garcia-GuizarCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  2. George W. Nulph v. Dave Cook, Director of the Department of Corrections Hardy Myers, Attorney General of the State of OregonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  3. United States v. Garcia-GuizarCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  4. James Charles Fenner v. United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  5. Plumley v. AustinSupreme Court of the United States · 2015

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API