Legal Opinion

United States v. Garcia-Guizar

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 20, 2000No. 99-10435PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CANBY, Circuit Judge:

Conrado Garcia-Guizar appeals from his resentencing by the district court pursuant to his conviction on four drug counts under 21 U.S.C. § 841 and one count of criminal forfeiture under 21 U.S.C. § 853(a)(1). We affirm.

Two major questions are presented. First, the district court’s finding of drug quantity under 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1), which was made at sentencing under a preponderance-of-the-evidence standard, was error under Apprendi v. New Jersey, _ U.S. _, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), because it increased the statutory maximum sentence beyond that which the…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Koon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. United States v. Robert Louis Syrax, AKA Bob Johnson, AKA Robert L. SyraxCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  2. United States v. HishawCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
  3. United States of America v. Kerry PoulackCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
  4. United States v. Brian Matthew ScheeleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  5. United States v. Jorge Guevara, AKA "Santa,"Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API