Legal Opinion

Alabama v. Smith

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 12, 1989No. 88-333PublishedCited by 1,353 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Rehnquist

James Lewis Smith pleaded guilty to charges of burglary and rape. In exchange for the plea, a sodomy charge was dropped. Later, Smith succeeded in having his guilty plea vacated. He went to trial on the three original charges, was convicted on each, and received a longer sentence on the burglary conviction than had been given after his guilty plea. The Alabama Supreme Court held that this increased sentence created a presumption of vindictiveness similar to that set forth in North Carolina v. Pearce, 395 U. S. 711 (1969). We hold that no presumption of vindictiveness arises when the first…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Stone v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Williams v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1949

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1,353 opinions

  1. Payne v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Agostini v. FeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. United States v. Larry D. KnoxCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
  4. State v. RuffOhio Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Bigon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2008

1,348 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API