Plumley v. Austin
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the Court
The motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.
2DissentJustice Thomas, joined by Justice SCALIAjoins
Forty-six years ago, this Court created a presumption of judicial vindictiveness that applies when a judge imposes a more severe sentence upon a defendant after a new trial. North Carolina v. Pearce, 395 U.S. 711 , 725-726, 89 S.Ct. 2072 , 23 L.Ed.2d 656 (1969). That presumption was-and remains-an anomaly in our law, which ordinarily " 'presum[es] ... honesty and integrity in those serving as adjudicators.' " Caperton v. A.T. Massey Coal Co., 556 U.S. 868 , 891, 129…
3Cases cited12 opinions
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Withrow v. LarkinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Alabama v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Caperton v. A. T. Massey Coal Co., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Texas v. McCulloughSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by9 opinions
- State v. Rahab (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2017
- McKenzie v. Allconnect, Inc.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2019
- State v. AndersonOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
- In re DoeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
- McFarland v. BaldaufDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2025
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.