Legal Opinion

Plumley v. Austin

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 20, 2015No. 14-271Relating-toCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.

2DissentJustice Thomas, joined by Justice SCALIAjoins

Forty-six years ago, this Court created a presumption of judicial vindictiveness that applies when a judge imposes a more severe sentence upon a defendant after a new trial. North Carolina v. Pearce, 395 U.S. 711 , 725-726, 89 S.Ct. 2072 , 23 L.Ed.2d 656 (1969). That presumption was-and remains-an anomaly in our law, which ordinarily " 'presum[es] ... honesty and integrity in those serving as adjudicators.' " Caperton v. A.T. Massey Coal Co., 556 U.S. 868 , 891, 129…

3Cases cited12 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Withrow v. LarkinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Alabama v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Caperton v. A. T. Massey Coal Co., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2009
  5. Texas v. McCulloughSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. Rahab (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2017
  2. McKenzie v. Allconnect, Inc.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2019
  3. State v. AndersonOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
  4. In re DoeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
  5. McFarland v. BaldaufDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2025

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API