Legal Opinion
James Charles Fenner v. United States Parole Commission
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 23, 2001No. 00-15074PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WALLACE, Circuit Judge:
Fenner appeals from the district court’s order denying his petition for habeas corpus relief. Almost three years after his release from federal custody, Fenner filed a pro se habeas petition challenging his special parole term. Less than one month later, he was arrested for parole violations. Fenner’s amended petition contends (1) that his sentence did not include a special parole term, and (2) that the United States Parole Commission (Commission) issued the warrant for his arrest in retaliation for filing a habeas petition. The district court had jurisdiction pursuant…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Alabama v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Wasman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Texas v. McCulloughSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Paul C. "Paulie" VillanoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- George W. Nulph v. Dave Cook, Director of the Department of Corrections Hardy Myers, Attorney General of the State of OregonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Lynell Lynnie Taylor, A/K/A Scoop, A/K/A Lynnie Lynell TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. BarwigCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- Plumley v. AustinSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- United States v. Greg CarterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.