Legal Opinion
George W. Nulph v. Dave Cook, Director of the Department of Corrections Hardy Myers, Attorney General of the State of Oregon
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 26, 2003No. 01-35556PublishedCited by 73 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge FERGUSON; Dissent by District Judge KING.
OPINION
FERGUSON, Circuit Judge.
Petitioner/Appellant George William Nulph appeals the District Court’s denial of his habeas petition, which alleged that the Oregon State Board of Parole *1054(“Board”) vindictively increased his sentence from 30-years to 75-years imprisonment after he prevailed in this Court on a previous habeas action challenging the Board’s retrospective application of two Oregon sentencing rules. The District Court denied the habeas petition, rejecting the Magistrate Judge’s recommendation to grant relief. We reverse.
I
A.…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Lindh v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Bordenkircher v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. GoodwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Alabama v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by73 opinions
- Susana Ferreira v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General Ronald J. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Daniel Lee Lewis v. D.A. MayleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. LaurientiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Steven H. Caswell v. Arthur Calderon, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Williams v. CavazosCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.