Legal Opinion
United States v. Conrado Garcia-Guizar
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 6, 2000No. 99-10435PublishedCited by 93 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
CANBY, Circuit Judge:
The opinion filed in this matter on September 20, 2000, and reported at 227 F.3d 1125, is amended as follows:
At 227 F.3d at 1127, delete the last sentence of the second paragraph of the opinion (beginning “We do not notice ...”). For the deleted sentence, substitute the following:
We conclude that the error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt, however, because the Ap-prendi error did not affect Garcia’s sentence.
The citation to United States v. Nordby then follows.
At 227 F.3d at 1129, delete the second full paragraph on the page (beginning “Because Garcia did not…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Koon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by93 opinions
- United States v. Juan Sanchez-Cervantes, AKA Hugo Quirox, Quiroc, Quiroz, Quiroz Trejo, and Quiroz TapiaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Shannon Wayne TigheCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Pantelis Antonakeas, AKA Alexx AntaeusCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Jose Manuel CandelarioCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Michael Andrew Smith, AKA the BirdCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.