Sutton v. Tanger
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
GRAY, J., pro tem.
In the above-entitled actions, tried together before a jury, each respondent recovered a judgment for injuries received in a collision between an automobile operated by Dorothy Sutton and in which F. N. Almstead was a passenger, and another automobile, owned by appellant and operated by a renter. Appellant first contends that his demurrers to each complaint should have been sustained, because, while the facts pleaded show his liability under section 1714% of tlie Civil Code, such section violates the requirement of article I, section 11, of the state Constitution that all…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Buelke v. LevenstadtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Kerns v. LewisMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
- Matter of Application of SchulerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- State ex rel. Rau v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
- Bosse v. MaryeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Baugh v. RogersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Hicks v. ReisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Souza v. CortiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Hughes v. QuackenbushCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Burgess v. CahillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.