Legal Opinion

Hicks v. Reis

California Supreme Court

Decided February 26, 1943No. L. A. 18523PublishedCited by 145 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PETERS, J. pro tern.

— Plaintiffs, husband and wife, recovered judgment against defendants Stanley Reis and John Reis in the sum of $6,487, and against defendant Fred W. Gray in the sum of $5,000, as damages for injuries sustained by them in a collision of their automobile with a car owned by Gray and driven by Stanley Reis at the request of John Reis, an employee of Gray. Gray was held liable under section 402 of the Vehicle Code, imposing liability on owners up to $5,000 for the negligence of any person using or operating an automobile with the consent, express or implied, of the owner. The…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Blank v. CoffinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Westberg v. WilldeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Engstrom v. Auburn Automobile Sales Corp.California Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Maupin v. SolomonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  5. Hughes v. QuackenbushCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by145 opinions

  1. Foreman & Clark Corp. v. FallonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Nichols v. MitchellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  3. California Shoppers, Inc. v. Royal Globe Insurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1985
  4. Shaw v. County of Santa CruzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  5. Thompson v. Occidental Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973

140 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API