Legal Opinion

Buelke v. Levenstadt

California Supreme Court

Decided March 23, 1923No. L. A. No. 7309PublishedCited by 63 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWaste, J.

The plaintiff, as administratrix of the estate of her deceased husband, brought this action to recover for injuries resulting in the death of the decedent and caused by the negligent operation of a motor vehicle by defendant Nat Levenstadt, a minor. The automobile was owned by defendant Morris Levenstadt, uncle of Nat, whose relation to the boy was that of in loco parentis, and who, in order that Nat might procure a license to operate a motor vehicle, had signed the required application therefor. At the time of the accident the uncle was not present, and the boy was engaged upon an…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Ex parte LiddellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Parker v. WilsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
  3. Daily v. MaxwellMissouri Court of Appeals · 1911
  4. Doran v. ThomsenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1908
  5. Bryant v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1917

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by63 opinions

  1. Estate of McDillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Richards v. StanleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Young v. MasciSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  4. Fair Political Practices Commission v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Hoff v. Vacaville Unified School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API