Burgess v. Cahill
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.
Plaintiffs have appealed from a judgment for the defendant H. P. Garin Co. entered pursuant to a directed verdict. No appeal was taken from the separate judgments entered for the plaintiffs against the other defendants.
The settled rule is that a court may direct a verdict only when, disregarding conflicting evidence and giving plaintiffs ’ evidence all the value to which it is legally entitled, *322indulging in every legitimate inference which may be drawn therefrom, the result is a determination that there is no evidence of sufficient substantiality to support a verdict in favor of the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Estate of LancesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Blank v. CoffinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Hicks v. ReisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Gavin v. Protestant Episcopal BishopCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- Engstrom v. Auburn Automobile Sales Corp.California Supreme Court · 1938
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Moore v. PalmerMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
- Peterson v. Grieger, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1961
- Glens Falls Ins. Co. v. Consolidated FreightwaysCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Elkinton v. California State Automobile Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Casey v. FortuneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.