Legal Opinion

Burgess v. Cahill

California Supreme Court

Decided May 4, 1945No. Sac. 5684PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.

Plaintiffs have appealed from a judgment for the defendant H. P. Garin Co. entered pursuant to a directed verdict. No appeal was taken from the separate judgments entered for the plaintiffs against the other defendants.

The settled rule is that a court may direct a verdict only when, disregarding conflicting evidence and giving plaintiffs ’ evidence all the value to which it is legally entitled, *322indulging in every legitimate inference which may be drawn therefrom, the result is a determination that there is no evidence of sufficient substantiality to support a verdict in favor of the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Estate of LancesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Blank v. CoffinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Hicks v. ReisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Gavin v. Protestant Episcopal BishopCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Engstrom v. Auburn Automobile Sales Corp.California Supreme Court · 1938

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Moore v. PalmerMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Peterson v. Grieger, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Glens Falls Ins. Co. v. Consolidated FreightwaysCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  4. Elkinton v. California State Automobile Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  5. Casey v. FortuneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API