Legal Opinion
Rialto Citizens for Responsible Growth v. City of Rialto
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 31, 2012No. E052253PublishedCited by 64 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KING, J.
I. INTRODUCTION
Defendant, City of Rialto (the City), approved a 230,000-square-foot commercial retail center to be anchored by a 24-hour Wal-Mart “Supercenter” (the project). Plaintiff, Rialto Citizens for Responsible Growth (Rialto Citizens), petitioned the trial court for a writ of administrative mandate invalidating several project approvals, including the City’s resolution certifying the final environmental impact report (the EIR) for the project, several resolutions *909amending the City’s general plan and the “Gateway Specific Plan” governing the project site, and an…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Laurel Heights Improvement Ass'n of San Francisco, Inc. v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Vineyard Area Citizens for Responsible Growth, Inc. v. City of Rancho CordovaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- Fukuda v. City of AngelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- Laurel Heights Improvement Ass'n of San Francisco, Inc. v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Save Our Peninsula Committee v. Monterey County Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- Poet v. State Air Resources BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Preserve Wild Santee v. City of SanteeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Citizens for a Sustainable Treasure Island v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Cleveland Nat'l Forest Found. v. San Diego Ass'n of GovernmentsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
- Center for Biological Diversity v. Department of Fish & WildlifeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.