Laurel Heights Improvement Ass'n of San Francisco, Inc. v. Regents of University of California
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PANELLI, J.
I. Introduction
After the passage of almost five years, we are again called upon to evaluate the efforts of the Regents of the University of California (Regents) to comply with the mandates of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Pub. Resources Code, § 21000 et seq.) in connection with the proposed relocation within the City of San Francisco of the biomedical research facilities of the School of Pharmacy at the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF). (See Laurel Heights Improvement Assn. v. Regents of University of California (1988) 47 Cal.3d 376 [253…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Marsh v. Oregon Natural Resources CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Laurel Heights Improvement Ass'n of San Francisco, Inc. v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Topanga Assn. for a Scenic Comm. v. CTY OF LOS ANGELESCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- No Oil, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Citizens of Goleta Valley v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by173 opinions
- Vineyard Area Citizens for Responsible Growth, Inc. v. City of Rancho CordovaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- Save Our Peninsula Committee v. Monterey County Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Committee for Green Foothills v. Santa Clara County Bd. of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- County of Amador v. El Dorado County Water AgencyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Bakersfield Citizens for Local Control v. City of BakersfieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
168 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.